Friday, October 31, 2008

"High-Fives" Do NOT Equal Salutations

Does anyone else have an annoyance for using the "high-five" as a salutation? I find that most use the "high-five" as a defense tactic to not knowing the social procedure in many different social settings. I have this friend that actually got a "high-five" as the good night gesture (hehe...I am guessing there wasn't a second date). My personal philosophy is when in doubt just wave if you aren't a "hugger" and you still feel a gesture is necessary in the situation. There are many acceptable times a "high-five" is in order such as (please note these are just a few examples):

  • During a sporting events and your team makes a great play.
  • You play a practical joke on a sibling with another sibling.
  • Playing flag football and someone makes a touchdown (this might call for a "ten" if it was a great play).
  • Playing "Too Slow Joe" with a toddler.
But please no "high-fiving" Jess as a salutation!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Prop 8 Yes

Another friend voicing his position!


On election night, when other states tune-in to see the results of Proposition 8, how will they see California? How will California regard marriage and how will California define the family? What will the purpose of marriage be in California and to whom will California extend the “right” and privilege to marry?


First, who has the “right” to marry? To answer this question, we must differentiate a “right” from a “right” for which we must qualify. For example, everyone has the “right” and opportunity to become a lawyer. However, one must qualify to be a lawyer. There are standards, qualifications, and hurdles. It is the only way the integrity of the profession can be protected. Now, we must acknowledge that some people in our society, because of no fault or failure of their own, do not have the physical, mental, or emotional capability of completing law school, passing the bar examination, and receiving the necessary credentials. Is the requisite of completing law school and passing the bar exam then bigotry? Does it create inequality? Is it unfair? For some of these people, it is their lifelong dream and passion to be a lawyer. The formal certification would bring them great happiness and give meaning to their life, yet we are still enforcing difficult and challenging requirements that prevent them from attaining their desire. Are these standards discriminatory? Is this unnecessary? Is this wrong? Are we hung up on the definition of a word that has no real impact? Are we taking away “rights?” Are we limiting “liberties?” Are we keeping good people from achieving the “happiness” only some can obtain? We also know the system isn’t perfect as many in the profession already fall short of performing as competent and honest lawyers. So, why not qualify everyone who wants to be lawyer? What difference will it really make? Quickly, we see the red flags and understand the consequences of such an idea. The definition DOES matter and the qualification must be ensured.


Similarly, everyone has the “right,” “freedom,” and opportunity to marry. However, one must also qualify to marry. There is a standard, a qualification, and a hurdle. It is the only way the integrity of the institution can be protected. A constitutional amendment limiting the union of marriage between one man and one woman does not take away that “right” or “freedom” from anybody. No “inequality” or “injustice” is created. If one is predisposed to same sex-attraction, we are not taking away his “right” to marry. We are simply limiting and reserving marriage to only those who properly qualify to marry. The integrity of marriage must be upheld and strengthened! We know not all heterosexual marriages and parents uphold the integrity of the commitment they’ve made, but the answer lies not in qualifying all and any, but in further strengthening the institution as it is (and demanding more and better from those already married).


Next, the “right” to marry must be given only when marrying a member of the opposite sex because of marriage’s unique purpose. Marriage is to provide an opportunity for a man and a woman to support and love each other and their children. To the child, marriage provides a stable foundation for support and love. Marriage unites the three core dimensions of parenthood – biological, social, and legal into one pro-child form. The unique characteristics of both mothers and fathers are crucial to the emotional, physical, and mental development of a child. Many would like to focus the Proposition 8 debate on the “rights” and “freedoms” of independent adults to practice marriage in the way they desire. However, we must focus the debate on the “rights” and “freedoms” of dependent children. We DO NOT have the “right” to tell one child they get two moms, another child they get two dads, and another child they get a mom and a dad. Every child has the “right” to a mom and dad! From the child’s point of view, Proposition 8 could not be more “fair,” more “necessary,” or more “right.” Proposition 8 is what will guarantee “equality for all.” Homosexual couples are extremely capable, intelligent, and caring. But, gender matters! Children have a need for both a mother and a father – the sexes are not interchangeable. Whatever a father can do a second mother CANNOT do. Whatever a mother can do, a second father CANNOT do. “Parents” DO NOT equal any two capable, loving adults. “Parents” equal a mom and a dad. We CANNOT equate that which is not equal.


Finally, we have inherited (and are fighting to maintain) the “right” to ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’ These "inalienable rights" often define what it means to be an American. However, we forget these freedoms are NOT without limitations. We must make and enforce laws to protect and preserve citizens from bringing undue harm upon themselves and/or others to protect the very “freedoms” and “rights” we enjoy. In that light, we must protect the “inalienable right” given to a child to have both a mom and a dad. And, we must protect the institution of marriage and uphold the most important and fundamental societal unit -- the family.


On election night, other states will see the results of Proposition 8 and California will say what our former President and Governor once said: “We will be as a city upon a hill!” California will be the example. California will stand up for marriage. California will support the family. California will give children both a mom and a dad. California will vote YES on Proposition 8!

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Why One Friend is Voting Yes on Prop 8

I am sure that many of you are wondering how it is even possible that a Stanford student could vote Yes on proposition 8. Let me explain. My personal belief is that marriage is not a contract between two people. It is not right. Marriage is a vital institution that shapes the rights and obligations of parenthood and affects and shapes society in profound ways in regard to how parents view the obligation of parenthood and their rights and responsibilities as fathers and mothers.

Why would society even control and regulate a relationship? Why would we let the government intervene into such a personal aspect in our lives? It is because society has a deep vested interest in marriage. It channels the sexual attraction between man and woman, which could lead to procreation, in a socially desirable way; that of a family unit where they are bound to provide and protect for the offspring which result from their sexual union. It was not created as a contract between two people to devote themselves to each other, rather society has created the institution of marriage so that a man and a woman set aside their personal objectives and goals to produce a family which they protect and are bound to the offspring that they create.

Society has a vested interest in marriage because it is in that union between man and woman in which children are created and brought into the world and we should be very concerned about how the children in this world are raised, taught, and cared for. The UN charter on children's rights states that all children have a right to be raised by the parents who brought them into the world; Marriage ensures that this is the case and holds parents responsible for how their children are raised and taught.

The genderless marriage paradigm is radically different in its aims and teachings and the two cannot exist concomitantly, for it would define marriage as a union between two people lacking the power of mutual procreation, thus stripping marriage of its function of regulating how we are bringing children into the world and forming their identity. The adoption of a marriage paradigm in which its primary concern is the two married partners is one I cannot support.

I love my gay friends and family. It is horrible how much persecution and discrimination homosexuals have suffered. I do agree that one benefit of allowing same-sex couples to marry would be a reduction in this persecution and discrimination. I believe that homosexual and heterosexual couples should be afforded the same rights as everyone. I empathize and understand that it is a rational and reasonable thing for same-sex couples to want the status that marriage affords. I believe, though, that the costs of redefining marriage are too great. I fear a society in which people think marriage is a way to pursue happiness, fulfillment, and selfish pursuits and dodge their parental and spousal obligations; Sadly this is already too often the case, but if we break the link between marriage and procreation this second best scenario will be institutionalized.

“The man-woman marriage institution is:

1. Society’s best and perhaps only effective means to secure the right of a child to know and be raised by her biological parents (with exceptions justified only when they are in the best interests of the child).

2. The most effective means yet developed to maximize the private welfare provided to children.

3. The indispensable foundation for that child-rearing mode that correlates with the optimal outcomes deemed crucial for a child’s, and therefore society’s, well-being.

4. Society’s primary and most effective means of bridging the male-female divide.

5. Society’s only means of transforming a male into husband-father and female into wife-mother, statuses and identities particularly beneficial to society.”

(from Stewart, Monte Neil, Marriage Facts, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, [Vol. 31 No. 1] pp. 321-322, http://www.marriagelawfoundation.org/mlf/publications/harvard%20facts.pdf)

Finally, I know that marriage is sacred, ordained of God, and gives to fathers and mothers, not rights, freedoms, and privileges as some would believe that marriage accords, but rather the solemn and powerful responsibility of “rear[ing] their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.”

(from The Proclamation to the World, by Gordon B. Hinckley as part of his message at the General Relief Society Meeting held September 23, 1995, http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,161-1-11-1,00.html)

DON'T FORGET TO VOTE!

Or be like Julie and get it done early!

Sunday, October 26, 2008

North Face Twins: Practically KT

To truly be genuine in my post I decided to post even our "ridiculous" photos because let's be honest KT and JB together almost always equals some amount of ridiculous behavior. ;) KT and I without even knowing got matching North Face jackets, complete with thumb or "monkey" holes. This is just one more piece of evidence that I am "practically" KT and KT is "practically" JB. Side note: This is my favorite jacket EVER!
North Face Ninjas!
Someone (namely me) forgot that Ninjas hold their fingers together....my bad! ;)

Never realized how tall and short we are till now!
I heart KT! What an awesome friend and a stalwart sprinter! ;)

Winner of the Brooke Trout PJ Party

Jess Deputy is all her glory! Congratulations, we bow down to the PJ master!

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

My Position

Facebook Note From Kimball again...affirming his position!

Of the many ways humans can relate to one other, the physical, emotional and even spiritual intimacy between a man and a woman privately and publicly committed to each other is the most sacred of all.

I used the word 'sacred' because I am spiritual. If you are not religious, try 'special' or 'separate' instead. I heard somewhere that 'sacred' in Hebrew means something like 'separate' anyway.

I don't have any studies or conclusive clinical studies to support this statement, I just feel the truth of it in my heart. I can't think of too many possible amendments or changes to this statement that don't result in something that feels a little less true. I'm sure it has something to do with biology. I'm sure it has something to do with physiology. I'm sure it has something to do with how our species is perpetuated. I'm sure it has something to do with feelings and tenderness and hopefully love. But each of these factors on their own surely contribute, but do not entirely account for this truth to me.

That said, I believe in, value and revere friendship in all its kinds and degrees. I believe in, value and revere companionship in all its kinds and degrees. I believe in, value, and revere commitment in all its kinds and degrees. But this greater truth readily and easily coexists with, and is even the culmination of, all these beliefs and values for me.

It's my belief that marriage as an institution reflects, affirms, and reinforces this truth. I believe that people fail marriage, I don't believe that marriage fails people.

The Opposition

Facebook Note from my friend, Kimball:

I came across this quote in my non-comprehensive research on the subject of gay rights:

"For the lesbian and gay movement, then, cultural goals include (but are not limited to) challenging dominant constructions of masculinity and femininity, homophobia, and the primacy of the gendered heterosexual nuclear family (heteronormativity). Political goals include changing laws and policies in order to gain new rights, benefits, and protections from harm."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_rights#cite_note-1

Insofar as this quote correctly characterizes opposition to Proposition 8, I support Proposition 8. I believe that gender, masculinity and femininity are important and essential to individuals, family and society. As to what 'dominant constructions of masculinity and femininity' refer to, I am not sure. I readily concede that there exist many cultural norms concerning masculinity and femininity that are unimportant at best and extremely damaging at worst. But at the end of the day, every person alive is the product of one man masculine enough and one woman feminine enough to get together, however briefly or committed to each other. (Indeed, anyone who is such a product deserves our individual and collective respect as a member of the human family. If people ever start resulting from some other way, I will revise my opinion accordingly, but until then, gender is critical to society in my view.)

Consequently, I am against homophobia, insomuch as it entails the devaluing or diminishing of anyone's humanity anywhere. I also do support anyone in their right to an aversion to unwelcome sexual advances.

I am in support of the primacy of the gendered heterosexual nuclear family.

The phrase, "new rights" did not escape me, and I think the relaxing of the concept of marriage in this case is an instance of an attempt to gain a right heretofore nonexistent. I also support any law that protects all people from harm. This is all I will say concerning the opposition to Proposition 8.

Most concerning to me is the implicit notion that the opposition hopes for no less than for society to assign the same sanctity to same-gender sex as to opposite-gender sex, which to me is offensive.

Whether or not this quote is overstating the intent of the opposition to Proposition 8 is another matter, but I suspect it is not. But I do respectfully and strongly disagree with the opposition to Proposition 8 (including many of you whom I care about) on these terms.

Kimball Bighorse
30 August 2008

Baby talks Prop 8 adoption & Gavin Newsom

Monday, October 20, 2008

Holy Incentives To Promote Prop 8!

Helping Prop 8 go viral just got sweeter! Check it out!

http://hizzeather.blogspot.com/

E*TRADE Baby is dating online

Yes on Prop 8

An Editorial from a friend:

YES ON 8

Don’t be fooled – Proposition 8 is not about equality or rights. Why not? Because homosexual couples already can have access to all the rights married couples have. Read it yourself:

“California Family Code: Section 297.5. (a) Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.”

Proposition 8 is about how we as a society choose to define marriage, and I believe that marriage should be about children. Admittedly, not every heterosexual couple chooses to have children themselves; but if marriage were just about two people loving each other, then why do we prevent siblings and cousins from marrying? I will vote YES on Proposition 8 and prevent same-sex marriage, not to deny anyone of rights (which they already have), but to define marriage in a way that will leave intact the foundational unit of human society.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Modge Podge Continued

Mikey's masterpiece!
Mer devouring our FREE Pizza Chicago, yes that is right, FREE!
Beautiful right?
Heather's masterpiece, proving that she is the master Modge Podger while we are simply amateurs.
Not really sure...Mikey was playing with her camera again.
Mine: I would like to state once again how impressed I was with my ability to pull this off! Thanks to HC of course!

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Josh The Mighty Hunter! Spoils of The Morning!

Matt says Josh called the Elk, while he may have been the one to shoot it. (Typical story every season between the bros, but I am going with Josh this year). He even did the gutting himself. I mean seriously, look at The Kid....definite Hunter! Not bad at all little Bro, not bad at all!
Although, he looks a little worn out! :)

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

5 Things

Simply because I wanted a fun post and to show Deborah that I deserve to be on her tagging list. :) But yeah I only got through five...I humbly bow down to the master, Deborah.

5 Shows I Watch
1. Sport Center
2. The Office
3. The Price Is Right
4. JAG
5. Gilmore Girls

5 Favorite Restaurants
1. South Legend (real Chinese food)
2. Berry Prime Rib House
3. Wendy's (yes, even in California it still makes the list)
4. Chiz's
5. My new fav: Back A Yard (best Caribbean I've had, thanks to Scott and B)

5 things I love about the fall
1. September (my birthday)
2. October (baseball playoffs)
3. Wearing my slippers everywhere!
4. Thanksgiving
5. Still wearing shorts since I am in CA

5 things on my wish list
1. A Caribbean vacation
2. Man-bait cookies (come on Mer!)
3. Behind home plate tickets in the new Yankee Stadium
4. A new Papasuan
5. Coyote hunting on the sleds at Christmas

5 important things to me
1. My family
2.The gospel
3. My weekly golf time
4. Gchatting with gchat staples (you know who you are)!
5. My 24 pk of Dr. Pepper supply underneath the bed

Monday, October 13, 2008

Reconciling The Heart and The Mind

A letter to the Editor from my dear friend, who definitely proves that one can and should reconcile what they know in their heart to their intellect. It is completely worth the read! Thanks to my friend for 1. taking the time to put your thoughts to paper and 2. being the rock that you are as per usual!

As a twenty-something Bay Area resident and a Stanford graduate, I have struggled recently as church leaders I love and trust have encouraged my participation in the "Yes on 8" campaign. I have gay friends and colleagues and have long embraced a "to each his own" mentality on the issue of same-sex marriage. It has been very difficult for me to reconcile my faith and my socio-political philosophy on this issue. I have done it, though, and it's important that I lay out my logic for two reasons: I) so that those on the "No" side of this issue can see that, though my reasoning is founded in my belief in a loving God, many of us on the "Yes" side have thought and prayed deeply about this issue and we aren't just thoughtless, fanatical, religious bigots, and II) so that others struggling to reconcile these two aspects of their lives can know they can reconcile their minds and their hearts and be empowered to do what they feel is right on November 4th.

I believe in an all-knowing, all-powerful Creator who loves each of us and wants us to be happy. Operating from this premise, it is easy to conclude that this Creator knows us better than we know ourselves. Like the mother who tells her young child not to play in the street or not to touch the hot stove God knows what will bring us the most joy and how we can best avoid and overcome heartache and pain.

There are things that I'm sure I would find to be quite pleasurable if I were to indulge in them, but that God has asked me not to do. Though specifics vary for each individual, these vices exist for all of us. I have found that as I abstain from the things the Lord has guided me away from – even when I have inside of me a seemingly innate propensity to do them -- I have eventually found joy and peace in those decisions. It hasn't always been easy. In fact many times it's been excruciating, but I can honestly say that when I don't do things the Lord has counseled me to avoid, in the long-term I am happier than if I do them. Similarly, I can see the heartache and trials and stress and worry that going against God's counsel has brought into my life, and the lives of my friends who have chosen to partake of their personal forbidden fruit.

Homosexuality is not a temptation for me, but it is for some people – it's how they are wired. I'm not pretending to know how hard it must be to deal with the challenges of same-sex attraction, but just as one can choose to wait until marriage to have sex, those struggling with same-sex attraction can choose for themselves whether they want to walk the path that God has pointed to and keep their appetites within the bounds He has set, or if they want to blaze their own trail. I won't condemn anyone for either choice, but I will promise them that walking the path their loving Heavenly Father has prepared for them—though we might not understand exactly why or how just yet—will eventually lead to greater happiness.

The Lord's path is in many ways harder, in some ways easier, and in all ways the best. I truly believe that an all-knowing God knows where all the paths of life could lead us, and that he has pointed us down the one leading to joy, peace, and happiness -- because He loves us.

I ask everyone to avoid the temptation to stereotype and demean those whose views differ from their own—and encourage everyone to reflect on what they feel is right and then to act on that conviction. I have, and I will: "Yes on 8."

Sunday, October 12, 2008

First Grade Field Trip to a Gay Wedding

On Friday in San Francisco the unimaginable happened that will continue to happen if Proposition 8 isn't passed. However you try and paint the picture, children will be taught that same-sex marriage is acceptable from as young of an age as a six-year-old in school. Are parents really ready to have schools to teach their children that such relationships are "equal" to traditional marriage or "normal"? I am not! Click on the Title to read the SF Chronicle article!

Saturday, October 11, 2008

You Know Enough....

Our spiritual journey is the process of a lifetime. We do not know everything in the beginning or even along the way. Our conversion comes step-by-step, line upon line. We first build a foundation of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. We treasure the principles and ordinances of repentance, baptism, and receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost. We include a continuing commitment to prayer, a willingness to be obedient, and an ongoing witness of the Book of Mormon. (The Book of Mormon is powerful spiritual nourishment.)

We then remain steady and patient as we progress through mortality. At times, the Lord’s answer will be, “You don’t know everything, but you know enough”—enough to keep the commandments and to do what is right. Remember Nephi’s words: “I know that he loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things.”2

Elder Neil L. Andersen
Of the Presidency of the Seventy


Thursday, October 9, 2008

The Family: A Proclamation to the World

In 1995, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles issued “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.” This proclamation is a declaration and reaffirmation of doctrines and practices that prophets have stated repeatedly throughout the history of the Church. It contains principles that are vital to the happiness and well-being of every family. Family members should study the proclamation and should live by its precepts.

“We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator’s plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

“All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.

“In the premortal realm, spirit sons and daughters knew and worshiped God as their Eternal Father and accepted His plan by which His children could obtain a physical body and gain earthly experience to progress toward perfection and ultimately realize his or her divine destiny as an heir of eternal life. The divine plan of happiness enables family relationships to be perpetuated beyond the grave. Sacred ordinances and covenants available in holy temples make it possible for individuals to return to the presence of God and for families to be united eternally.

“The first commandment that God gave to Adam and Eve pertained to their potential for parenthood as husband and wife. We declare that God’s commandment for His children to multiply and replenish the earth remains in force. We further declare that God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.

“We declare the means by which mortal life is created to be divinely appointed. We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance in God’s eternal plan.

“Husband and wife have a solemn responsibility to love and care for each other and for their children. ‘Children are an heritage of the Lord’ (Psalms 127:3). Parents have a sacred duty to rear their children in love and righteousness, to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens wherever they live. Husbands and wives—mothers and fathers—will be held accountable before God for the discharge of these obligations.

“The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity. Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. Successful marriages and families are established and maintained on principles of faith, prayer, repentance, forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, and wholesome recreational activities. By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families. Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners. Disability, death, or other circumstances may necessitate individual adaptation. Extended families should lend support when needed.

“We warn that individuals who violate covenants of chastity, who abuse spouse or offspring, or who fail to fulfill family responsibilities will one day stand accountable before God. Further, we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

“We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society”

Interfaith Fast: October 12th (Sunday)

Please join an interfaith fast on Sunday, October 12th for California Proposition 8.

Whatever your professed faith may be, your faith and fasting can bring forth the powers of heaven. Please abstain from food and drink on Sunday, October 12th and please pray for a positive outcome for California's Proposition 8 (Yes on Prop 8), that hearts may be softened, and that understanding and wisdom will prevail and marriage between a man and a woman will be protected.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

IMPORTANT: Should This "JB" Be Admitted Into The JB Club?

Application submitted for admission into The JB Club from: Jonathan Blake Hammer

I hereby submit my application to join the "nicknamed JB" club. My application is simple: just ask yourself, could you say no to this cute of a face?

Respectfully yours,
Jonathan Blake Hammer

Props Jonathan for trying to appeal to your audience! :) Vote Now: Yah or Nah! Your votes will be considered and then JB and I will make a final decision.
PS: Don't ya just want to squeeze those cheeks?

Making Reija Matheson's Gchat Status!!!

Haiku Ode on Jessica Berry's Red Dot:
Round and red and plump
Your sweet name succulently
Symbolized on screen.

Learning To Be Creative: Modge Podge

Look Shalece, not bad right!!!
I am sure the DP gave me the necessary inspiration for this masterpiece!
The mastermind behind the Modge Podge evening! Outside of stealing Mer's idea to paint my canvas and stealing the bubble cutting from HC I would say that I was impressed by my creativity tonight. It was such a fun evening: FREE Pizza Chicago, finger-painting, Dr. Pepper, H,M,&M! Thanks Heather! You pulled girls' night off excellently! :)

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Saying Farewell to 1T 3232


Today my heart fell a bit and there was definitely a moment of silence standing next to the Silver Bullet after my faithful Idaho license plates were traded in for your generic, "be-like-the-crowd" California plates. I've never driven my car without my 1T 3232 license plates until today. 1T 3232 was in the Berry Family long before I started driving legally. I remember how I learned quickly as a child to memorize the license: 3232 (Magic Johnson's number twice, MJ's number backwards twice, and our local sheriff's office number backwards). The only consolation prize is that my new plates end in the number seven, but how am I to make such correlation with sports figures with random letters and generic numbers? I will miss seeing 1T 3232 everyday....maybe I'll frame the plates and put them up in the apartment.

The Hunt For October

October is here and baseball dirt is in the air. Some might say: Marry me to Reggie Jackson and call me Mrs. October. Others might glorify in the fact that Sports Center is almost strictly dedicated to the Post-season playoffs. October really is the 2nd greatest month of the year (next to September, of course (lots of important birthdays that month!!!))! The Dodgers lead the Cubs 3-0 in the NLDS and it looks like they just might be taking their lunch box (see above picture) to the World Series with Joe Torre at the helm. While Boston leads the Angels 3-0 I am still praying for some immortal angels to come help those boys tomorrow night. Yes, I am aware that this is the first time in 14 seasons my Yanks haven't made the playoffs, but at the end of the day my Yanks are still my Yanks and I still heart October!